<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wizards of Smart &#187; MVP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wizardsofsmart.net/tag/mvp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wizardsofsmart.net</link>
	<description>.NET Design Patterns</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:40:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta2-14896</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ViewModel Futures</title>
		<link>http://wizardsofsmart.net/patterns/viewmodel-futures/</link>
		<comments>http://wizardsofsmart.net/patterns/viewmodel-futures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 04:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>panesofglass</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MVVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ViewModel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wizardsofsmart.net/patterns/viewmodel-futures</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Block asked two questions on Twitter tonight that were too good to pass up. First, do you want better tooling, more testable data binding, or a ViewModel base class? I agree with whoever said patterns exist to make up for faults in a language; however, in this case, I think I would choose enhancements [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn Block asked two questions on Twitter tonight that were too good to pass up. First, do you want better tooling, more testable data binding, or a ViewModel base class? I agree with whoever said patterns exist to make up for faults in a language; however, in this case, I think I would choose enhancements to data binding. It&#8217;s a little too magical, imho.</p>
<p>I would like to see a ViewModel base eventually, though, as that would be one less thing to wire up myself, and it hopefully silence all the people complaining about the lack of a model in MVC. (Yes, I am thinking the backend models should be sharable among WPF, Silverlight, and MVC.)</p>
<p>Glenn&#8217;s second question related to tv target audience. I am always a fan of simple explocicity, to borrow a word from JB. I think that&#8217;s what the experts use. Also, I don&#8217;t know many who want to me mediocre some day, so going for the best and letting it trickle down is a great idea.</p>
<p>Just my $.02.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wizardsofsmart.net/patterns/viewmodel-futures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
